Chris Jordan IPL Profile: Pace, Precision, and the 30-Wicket Story England’s Chris Jordan has built a seven-season IPL résumé that speaks louder with the ball than with the bat. Across 34 bowling innings for five different franchises—most recently Mumbai Indians in 2023—Jordan has claimed exactly 30 wickets from 668 deliveries, striking once every 22.27 balls. His best spell of 4 for 26 highlights a knack for breakthroughs, while three three-wicket hauls underline consistency in pressure overs. The numbers reveal an attacking mindset: an economy of 9.61 is the price for hunting wickets in a league that rewards fearless pace, and Jordan has never shied away from the challenge. With the bat, Jordan remains a handy lower-order striker. In 12 innings he has muscled 81 runs at a strike rate of 105, peppering the boundary with three fours and three sixes and topping out at 30*. Those cameos act as bonus runs rather than headline acts, reinforcing why teams value him primarily as a death-overs enforcer. From RCB in 2016 to MI in 2023, franchises have banked on Jordan’s mix of express pace, yorkers and calm head. Thirty wickets spread over six campaigns tell the story of a bowler who turns up, lets the ball rip, and keeps the scoreboard moving—exactly what T20 cricket demands.

Shreyas Iyer IPL batting story: 3,731 runs, 314 fours, 152 sixes in 131 innings – a strike-rate of 133 that turns every ball into a boundary threat. Ten seasons of consistency, 27 fifties, and a career-best 97 prove he is one of the league’s premier top-order anchors. From captaining Delhi Capitals through their 2018-21 rise to lifting the 2024 Kolkata Knight Riders trophy and now leading Punjab Kings in 2025, Iyer’s bat has done the talking. No wickets, no worries: his 2,798-ball dominance is crafted for run-glut, not dot-ball pressure. Watch for the 314 fours that pierce gaps and the 152 sixes that clear them—Shreyas Iyer remains IPL’s middle-over maestro and powerplay finisher rolled into one.

Note: This overview is partially generated using AI and is based on statistical data. Please verify with official sources for complete accuracy.